Created: September 15, 2024 | Edited: September 15, 2024
A year ago, Unity announced their “runtime fee”/“installation fee”.
This had made many people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move.
By a funny coincidence I received the mail from Unity that the runtime fee has gone while working on the “Godot Private Asset Library” (a while later GameFromScratch had it).
Next funny thing: Our last blog-post addressing this is from 2023-09-15, so exactly one-year-old ^^
I thought Unity had taken it back after the backlash? but it seems it was only the retro-active part they walked back on? I cared so little about that, since I was like “I’ll finish all projects in Unity I have and will, whenever I can, create everything in Godot now” and didn’t even notice/bother, since I stayed on the Unity versions I had with my projects to not fall into some weird legal trap. That doesn’t mean that I didn’t watch a lot of videos about this clusterfck, I just missed that detail? Or forgot about it?
The retroactive change was fishy at best and straight up illegal at worst anyways.
Despite their fckup, Unity had and still has some awesome features. For example the asset exporter.
For our example we'll use the SpielmannSpiel Intro (link to yt?) asset, since it is something I don’t want to be on the public internet available and finished recreating in Godot already.
So I had this export lying around for ~4 years and just imported it into every new game and basically never touched it again.
Now I was challenged to do the same for all our new Godot projects, or rather finding out how to do that.
I spoke to Plantprogrammer how to approach this in Godot and his suggestion, with which I agree, was to clone our asset libraries into subfolders in the Godot game-projects as Git-Submodules.
The downside to the Git-Submodule approach is all the stuff the root-folder of a project has, since I could have:
The latter seemed like a lot of overhead again, so a separate project for each asset pack it is.
The file/folder madness of the Intro.
So how to solve the “git-submodule file madness” problem? Godot has an asset library that does not have this problem, how does this work?
And why is “Site” a dropdown with only one entry?
So after a read on the `Submitting to the Asset Library` I googled and someone build something like what I wanted but not quite godot-custom-assetlib. I didn’t need a feature complete Implementation of the Godot Asset Store or database, just enough to “deliver” the assets from the git repos.
But this was the “It IS possible” proof that I needed.
Digging a bit into the Godot asset library website code I found the extremely simple API (which is meant as a compliment). So I did what I do best: Started a new project.
I like using the right tool for the right job, so I defined the job:
I was looking for a use case for Python’s FastAPI for a while, so since this is “just an Web-API” this was the perfect opportunity. Python and FastAPI it is then.
Sadly I don’t know the exact times, but I had something primitive hard coded running within 30 minutes. Overall from creation to first release was 3 days while programming in my spare time.
A technically working wip.
The asset projects should adhere to the Godot asset store submission guidelines.
Clone the Godot Private Asset Library repository.
Clone the private repositories into the “godot_assets” folder.
Start the server.
Start your godot project.
Setup the new asset library.
Import your asset.
Profit.
What else? Before I created PEBI and put a Steam banner maker into it, I used to create all Steam banners in Unity and screenshotted them.
That was easier than trying to align images and text by hand in paint.net (I love paint.net btw 💖), since I don’t have any adobe or similar products.
So the banner for this blogpost is made with godot. Also, the dissolve effect I found was really fitting.
Unity’s removal of the run-time fee feels like a panic move.
They seem to have noticed that people are fleeing the engine as fast as possible. All the “small indies and hobbyists that are unimportant anyways” from a business standpoint to Unity, which ironically make the big community and a lot of “free work” in forum and with tutorials and blogposts, etc, are actually important but not quantifiable in shareholder cashout.
This is no reason to change our path.
Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me.
Unity has proven to be not a trust-worthy business partner.
As said, we still work on and release Unity projects.
They are either older projects, that continue to get updates (like the Progress Bar Simulator) or for which we have code-assets (like the DACHstudio Jigsaw Puzzle Box) or the toolset/ecosystem is not quite there yet (like Live2D character exports).
But there are currently 4 small projects in the works in Godot, to learn and test the waters and having reusable assets at our disposal.
The transition is slow, but underway.